In a commentary, CDT leader Alexandra Givens added that Trump’s transfer used to be a “direct assault” on loose speech. “The federal government can not and will have to no longer drive on-line intermediaries into moderating speech in keeping with the President’s whims,” she stated.
Twitter unsurprisingly helps the lawsuit. It pointed Engadget to a statement calling the order a “reactionary and politicized solution to a landmark regulation” that would “threaten the way forward for on-line speech.” You’ll be able to learn the entire commentary under.
It gained’t be sudden if extra prison battles observe, however CDT’s is a outstanding instance. It would additionally raise some weight within the tech trade past Twitter’s approval, as CDT’s board comprises executives from Microsoft and Mozilla.
— Twitter Public Coverage (@Coverage) June 2, 2020